![]() Part of this might stem from possibility of gleaning name based identifiers from clear-text areas of partially encrypted files (such as XML portions of. (even instances of people who advertise services to “crack or spoof” NT identifiers solely name based. I agree, life would be simpler with just AD names, but there are public proclamations that declare solely named based identifiers aren’t the most strident. ![]() ![]() Is there a way to restructure this, or add entries so all members of the group from all domains will be authenticated both via NTNAME
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |